PROBLEMS OF POLICY REGULATION ON ROBOTICS

Автор(и)

  • О.В. Турута доцент кафедри філософії Харківського національного університету радіоелектроніки, Україна
  • О.О. Жидкова доцент кафедри програмної інженерії Харківського національного університету радіоелектроніки, Україна
  • О.П. Турута доцент кафедри програмної інженерії Харківського національного університету радіоелектроніки, Україна

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2021.65.2

Ключові слова:

robot, law rules on robotics, civil liability of a robot, intellectual property

Анотація

The article discusses the main problems in the field of legal regulation of the functioning of the robots, definition
of “robot”, as well as the understanding, interpretation, and evaluation of the civil liability for the robot’s actions are
viewed in the paper. The article analyses the possibility of endowing robots with legal personality, as well as various
approaches to liability for damage caused by a robot to property or to a person. The question is raised about bringing
the robot to criminal and civil liability. The question is raised about the regulation of intellectual property rights to an
object created by a robot. If a robot creates music, a picture or text, who owns the rights to them: the robot developer
or the head of the creative process, whether the robot itself. The article analyses a feature that is very important for the
legal perspective of the problem – it is a turn from understanding a robot as an entertainment product to the direction
of development and research of social interaction between a robot and a human. The question is raised about the need
to adopt new legal norms aimed at regulating the legal status of a robot, liability for damage caused by it, as well as
legal problems of intellectual property associated with the functioning of robots. The analysis of the legal frameworks
regarding robots in different countries of the world is performed. The article introduces the need to develop appropriate
legislative support in the field of robotics: interpreting the term “robot”, determining the legal regime of its functioning,
developing a unified approach to liability for harm caused by a robot and developing uniform rules for protecting intel-
lectual property rights when using a robot. Legal regulation is necessary not only at the national level, but also globally.

Посилання

Tsvirkun, L.I., & Gruler, G. Robotics and mechatronics: navch.posib. National Mining University, 216p.L. I. Cricket

and G. Gruler, Robotics and mechatronics: a textbook, 3rd ed. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, National

Mining University, 2017. 224 p.

Eidenmueller H. The Rise of Robots and the Law of Humans. Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper. 2017. № 27. Available at SSRN. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract =2941001 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2941001.

Richards N.M., Smart W.D. How should the Law Think about Robots? Robot Law. vol. Chapter 1, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016. – 402 р.

R. Calo, Robotics and the New Cyberlaw SSRN Journal, 2014, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2402972.

ISO 8373:2012 «Robots and robotic devices. Vocabulary», available at https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/ru/#iso:std:iso:8373:ed-2:v1:en

COMEST (2017). Report of COMEST on Robotics Ethics. UNESCO, available at https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000253952.

European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)) https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0051_EN.html

Buyers J. Liability Issues in Autonomous and Semi-Autonomous systems. Osborne Clarke LLP January 2015,

available at https://www.osborneclarke.com /media/filer_public/c9/73/c973bc5c-cef0-4e45-8554-f6f90f396256/itech_law.pdf.

P. Asaro. Robots and Responsibility from a Legal Perspective. 2007.

Hallevy G. The criminal liability of artificial intelligence entities – from science fiction to legal social control. Akron Intellectual Property Journal. 2010. Vol. 4. P. 171–201.

Recommendation № 2102 of Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe «Technological convergence, artificial intelligence and human rights», 28 April. 2017.

URL: https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=23726&lang=en.

Intellectual Property Strategic Program (2016), available at https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/titeki2/kettei/

chizaikeikaku20160509_e.pdf.

Ryan Abbott, I Think, Therefore I Invent: Creative Computers and the Future of Patent Law, 57B.C.L. Rev.1079. 2016, available at http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu /bclr/vol57/iss4/2.

Sinelnikova V.N., Revinsky O.V. Rights to the results of artificial intelligence. Copyright № 4. P. 17–27. P. 26.

Moriggi A. The role of intellectual property in the intelligence explosion. 4iP Council Research Award Winner 2017 (Second Place), available at http://www.4ipcouncil.com/application/files/9615/1638/1031/The_Role_of_Intellectual_Pro

perty_in_the_ Intelligence_ Explosion.pdf.

Ralph D. Clifford. Intellectual Property in the Era of the Creative Computer Program: Will the True Creator Please Stand Up? Tulane Law Review. 1997. Vol. 71. P. 1675–1703. P. 1702.

Erica Fraser. Computers as Inventors – Legal and Policy Implications of Artificial Intelligence on Patent Law. SCRIPTed. 2016. Vol. 13. № 3. P. 305–333. P. 323.

##submission.downloads##

Опубліковано

2021-10-25

Номер

Розділ

Розділ 1. Теорія та історія держави і права; історія політичних і правових учень